There is also a great potential for oil and gas exploration in this region, which complicates the issue further. More importantly, from China's point of view, about 75 per cent of Japan's oil is transported through the South China Sea. 201.ġ6 The economic significance arises out of the large volume of trade shipments that pass through the region. ![]() 13–14.ġ5 See Jing Huang, ‘Economic and Political Costs’, in Steve Tsang (ed.), If China Attacks Taiwan: Military Strategy, Politics and Economics, Routledge, New York, 2006, p. Christensen, ‘The Contemporary Security Dilemma: Deterring a Taiwan Conflict’, The Washington Quarterly, 25(4), 2002, pp. If the United States decides to transfer such a system to Taiwan, Beijing would construe that move as the restoration of a quasi-alliance. Kerry Dumbaugh, ‘Taiwan: Recent Developments and US Policy Options’, CRS Report for Congress, updated November 9, 2007, at (Accessed January 7, 2008).ġ4 In March 2005, the United States and Japan designated Taiwan as a common strategic objective. In September 2007, the Pentagon announced the total weapons sales at a value of US$2.2 billion, which additionally included 12 surplus Orion P3-C maritime patrol craft and 144 SM-2 Block 3A Standard anti-aircraft missiles. In June 2007, Taiwan's legislature passed the national defence budget, which allotted funds for the purchase of P-3 Orion anti-submarine reconnaissance, the upgrading of the Patriot missile defence batteries, and to provide for the purchase of additional F-16 C/D fighters. 418–421.ġ3 ‘Table 8A.2: Military Expenditure by Country, in Local Currency, 1997–2006’, SIPRI Yearbook 2007, n. ‘Appendix 10A: The suppliers and recipients of major conventional weapons’, SIPRI Yearbook 2007, n. Kan, ‘China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy-Key Statements from Washington, Beijing and Taipei’, CRS Report for Congress, updated December 13, 2007, at (Accessed January 7, 2008).ġ2 During 2002–2006, Taiwan was the 12th largest recipient of major conventional weapons, at an aggregate value of US$2.1 billion (at constant 1990 prices). I, ’The Security Situation’, at (Accessed July 4, 2007).ġ1 The United States, bound to protect Taiwan under the US–Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, is authorized to supply it with weapons of a defensive nature. The move is also seen as an exercise that would provide the United States with a much better manoeuvring space, as well as the ability to shape the Chinese security environment to its advantage.ġ0 The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China, China's National Defense in 2004, ch. 1, August 29, 1997, at (Accessed July 21, 2007).ħ The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China, China's National Defence in 2006, Beijing, December 2006, at (Accessed August 5, 2008).Ĩ Although India has not been identified as a threat by China in any of the white papers or other documents, it might be useful from an Indian point of view to analyse Chinese perspectives on the country and its role in the emerging Asian security architecture.ĩ A Taiwan seeking independence could also give rise to new separatist movements in Xinjiang and Tibet. See Li Jijun, ‘Traditional Military Thinking and the Defensive Strategy of China’, address at the United States War College, Letort Paper No. 192.Ħ Li Jijun added that, for a country that has been the victim of repeated aggression and pillage and which suffered a great deal of war and turmoil, peace, and unity are very critical in the national thinking. ![]() Overholt, Modernising China's Military: Opportunities and Constraints, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2005, p. 6, at (Accessed August 5, 2008).ĥ ‘PLA Threat Perceptions and Force Planning’, in Keith Crane, Roger Cliff, Evan S. 270.Ĥ Yu Xintian, ‘Harmonious World and China's Path for Peaceful Development’, International Review, 45, 2006, p. 98–107.ģ Petter Stalenheim, Catalina Perdomo, and Elisabeth Skons, ‘Military Expenditure’, SIPRI Yearbook 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007, p. Banlaoi, ‘Southeast Asian Perspectives on the Rise of China: Regional Security after 9/11’, Parameters, Summer 2003, pp. ![]() Shulsky, Patterns in China's Use of Force: Evidence from History and Doctrinal Writings, Project AIR FORCE, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2000 and Rommel C. Ka Po Ng, Interpreting China's Military Power: Doctrine Makes Readiness, Frank Cass, New York, 2005 Mark Burles and Abram N. Yang (eds.), In China's Shadow: Regional Perspectives on Chinese Foreign Policy and Military Development, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1998 Bang Quan Zheng, ‘A Rising China: Catalysts for Chinese Military Modernisation’, in Sujian Guo (ed.), China's Peaceful Rise in the 21st Century: Domestic and International Conditions, Ashgate Publishing House, Hampshire, 2006, pp. 1 Mao, ‘On Protracted War’, Selected Works, Vol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |